The impact of the open-access status on journal indices: oncology journals.

The impact of the open-access status on journal indices: oncology journals.

The area of oncology is amongst the highest productive fields in medication, with the highest impact journals. The impact of open entry (OA) journals continues to be understudied in the area of oncology. In this examine, we intention to check the open-access status of oncology journals and the impact of the open-access status on journal indices.

MethodsWe collected information on the included journals from Scopus Source List on 1st of November 2018. We filtered the checklist for oncology journals for the years from 2011 to 2017. OA journals coated by Scopus are indicated as OA if the journal is listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) and/or the Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources (ROAD).

There have been 318 oncology journals in comparison with 260 in 2011, a rise by about 24.2%, and the proportion of OA journals has elevated from 19.6% to 23.9%.

Although non-OA journals have considerably increased scholarly output (P=0.001), % cited and supply normalized impact per paper (SNIP) have been increased for OA journals.Publishing in oncology OA journals will yield extra impact, in time period of citations, and can attain boarder viewers.

The impact of the open-access status on journal indices: oncology journals.
The impact of the open-access status on journal indices: oncology journals.

A retrospective evaluation of radiation oncology associated scientific articles in the journal Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound: Trends over 40 years (1976-2015).

The journal Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound is a veterinary specialty journal dedicated to the fields of veterinary diagnostic imaging and radiation oncology.

The objective of this retrospective, observational examine is to guage progressive traits in radiation oncology articles revealed in Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound throughout the 40-year interval (1976-2015) and describe a shift of traits by a number of viewpoints. This 40-year interval was divided into 4 subperiods: Period 1 (1976-1985), Period 2 (1986-1995), Period 3 (1996-2005), and Period 4 (2006-2015).

These articles have been divided into six classes primarily based on the nature of the examine:

1) research associated to teletherapy with endpoints being affected person final result, 2) radiation remedy dosimetry/planning, 3) affected person setup, 4) critiques, 5) case studies, and 6) others. The quantity of radiation oncology articles in Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound has elevated over the 40-year interval. The quantity of authors per article has elevated between Periods 1 and three.

The quantity of articles associated to linear accelerator has elevated between Periods Three and 4.

The median quantity of handled sufferers per scientific article associated to teletherapy ranged from 15 to 21, which has not modified considerably over the 40-year interval. The mostly used radiation remedy protocols throughout Periods 2 and three have been fine-fractionated protocols (outlined as 10 or extra fractions), whereas coarse-fractionated protocols have been extra frequent throughout Periods 1 and 4.

Findings from this examine spotlight the notable modifications of traits in veterinary radiation oncology articles revealed in Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, which clearly replicate modifications in the area of veterinary radiation oncology throughout the previous 40 years.

Back to top